quinta-feira, 25 de junho de 2009

Fashion


Fashion has ceased to be synonymous of futility and long improvisation. The word "fashion" comes from the Latin modus, meaning "order", "way”. Is nothing but a system that monitors the clothing and time, integrating the use of simple daily clothes to a larger context, political, social, sociological.

You can see what the fashion chooses to dress in the morning, the catwalks of Brazil and the world, in magazines and even in the suit a politician wear or you grandmother’s dress. Fashion is not just "run". Fashion is much more than clothes. Think about the way that people wore in the 70s, 80s, and try, yet, find a denominator to what people wore in the 90s.

These developments and changes are fashion. To monitor these changes, fashion serves as a reflection of the companies around. You can view a group, a country, the world at that time the fashion then practiced. The fashion has undergone a change with the birth of the bourgeoisie in Europe.

The bourgeois blatantly copied the tissues, the way to wear and carry is of the nobility, it was not very happy to be in with these opinion plebes "wealthy." Then began to create internal codes of dress that move quickly, before the bourgeoisie had time to copy them. In this period were also established rules of etiquette, in order also to differentiate the origin. The nobility then fell, the bourgeoisie became the masters of the world, but the fashion of fashion took.

Currently, you may get used to a system that restricts the fashion in fashion, trends and fashions. But it has always been so? Contrary to what we might think of our globalized world, fashion is not universal, because people know the original concept. Neither the fashion is something that has existed for a long time: in ancient Egypt not changed clothes in a period of 3 thousand years.

Gradually, changes in clothing are happening. In the 19th century, fashion then to meet the needs of personal statement, the individual as a member of a group, and also to express ideas and feelings. Before, there was no distinction between the tissues used by men and used by women, was in the 19th century that clothing of these two groups differ from more.

Many feel manipulated by fashion. "Being in fashion" seems to be something for an elite (economic, social and cultural), and therefore makes some anger from those who are "outside". Forget that there is also fashion of the ghettos, the niche, the style of the counterculture, alternative, “anticonformist” of protest.


By: Isabella Rodrigues

The famous

A famous speaker began a seminar in a room with 200 people, holding a bill of R$100,00.
He asked: "Who of you wants this bill of R$ 100,00?
All raised their hands.
Then he said: "I will give this bill to one of you tonight, but first, let me do this ..."
So he totally crushed the note.
He asked again: "Who still wants this bill?"
The hands were still raised.
He continued: "And if I do this ..." He left the bill fall to the ground, began to step on it and scrubed it.
Then he took the note, now filthy and mashed and asked: "And now…
"Who will still want this note of R$ 100,00?
All hands turned to erect.
The speaker turned to the audience and said that they explain the following:
"No matter what I do with the money, you still want this bill, because it does not lose its value.
This also happens with us ... Many times in our lives, we are squashed, feeling fuller and got in without importance. But no matter, we never lose our value. Dirty or clean, squashed or whole, lean or fatty, high or low, nothing matters, none of this changes the importance that we have ... The price of our lives, is not so appear to be, but for what we do and we know!”

Now, reflect and look well in his memory:
1 - Name the 5 richest people in the world.
2 - Name the last 5 winners of the Miss Universe.
3 - Name the 10 Nobel Prize winners.
4 - Name the last 5 winners of the Oscar award as best actors or actresses.

How Come? Bad huh ... Difficult to remember???... Do not worry. None of us remember the best of yesterday.
The applause go away! The trophies are full of dust! The winners are forgotten!

Now, do the following:
1 - Name 3 teachers who helped you in your real training.
2 - Name 3 friends who have helped you in difficult times.
3 - Think about some people that you made someone feel special.
4 - Name 5 people who passed your time.

How was it? Better, right?
People who make our life are not those with the best credentials, more money, or the best awards… Are those that concern us, taking care of us, those who, somehow, are on our side.
Reflect a moment ... Life is too short ... In wich list are you?
You don’t know?
Let me give you a hand ... You are not among the famous, but is among those who really loves you!

Daniel Nielsen

segunda-feira, 22 de junho de 2009

Are Brazilians right?


When brazilians talk about politics, they always say things like : "There is not hope for this country", "Our president is not good enough" and many other things like that!

Is it true or we are too pessimistics to see what's real or not?

There is no obligation for anyone to like our president, but at least we should give him more chances for showing how far can he go. And according to article below from New York Times, it would not be a waste of time:


"As the popular two term president of Brazil Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva presided over a period of significant growth in the economy that has solidified the country as the center of gravity in Latin America and an increasingly important player in the world.
A former factory worker with a fifth grade education, Mr. da Silva - known as Lula inside Brazil - had a long political career as a leftist leader before his landslide election as President in 2002.
Despite some concerns about how he and his Workers' Party would govern, and despite a series of political scandals that threatened to derail his career, Mr. da Silva has demonstrated a light touch when it comes to economic stewardship and political diplomacy, avoiding the populist impulses of other leftist leaders ascendant through much of the region, including Venezuela and Bolivia.
Mr. da Silva fostered Brazil's growth through a centrist combination of respect for financial markets and targeted social programs, which have lifted millions out of poverty and narrowed the yawning income gap between rich and poor."


Cincinced? No? So, as you say just the other leaders, specially the american ones are the good ones, why don't you read a little bit of the international opinions about our president:


"President Barack Obama — wildly popular the world over — says he isn't the globe's most admired politician. He says that title belongs to Brazil's president.
During a lunch at the Group of 20 summit in London, Obama shook hands with President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and said: "This is my man, right here. I love this guy."

A bemused Silva — who does not speak English — appeared to enjoy the comments as they were relayed by an interpreter, grasping Obama's outstretched hand with both of his.
Obama followed the comment by saying Silva is "the most popular politician on Earth" and that it is because of "his good looks."
The comments were broadcast on Brazilian television and Internet sites in the original English with Portuguese subtitles."


Brazil still has many chances of growing up and stay in the same level as the big ones, the only thing to do is give honest people more chances of doing their best and giving our citizen proud of being Brazilians!





Pedro Casadei

Scuffles in Tehran as Ahmadinejad and Mousavi both claim victory



Iran faced turmoil last night as the hardline President and his centrist challenger both claimed victory in a bitterly contested election.

The offical news agency reported that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had won, and the state elections chief said that the President had 69 per cent of the vote with 35 per cent of the ballots counted. However, the main challenger, Mir Hossein Mousavi, insisted that he was the "definite winner" by a substantial margin, and an aide suggested that he had taken 65 per cent.

The official result will be announced today, but the huge turnout ─ close to the historic record of 80 per cent ─ appeared to favour Mr Mousavi’s claim. Urban, middle-class Iranians, who seldom bother to vote, did so yesterday because they thought Mr Ahmadinejad’s first four years in office a disaster.
It was widely alleged, but never proved, that vote-rigging secured Mr Ahmadinejad’s unlikely victory in 2005. He entered that election an unknown, but was backed by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader.

If Mr Ahmadinejad is declared the victor, there is a danger of violence in Tehran and other cities. On Thursday Mohammad Atrianfar, a Mousavi adviser, said that the President could win only by cheating, and predicted riots and chaos if that happened. Saeed Laylaz, a respected political consultant, said that he feared a "Tiananmen Square-style experience", with the military crushing protests.

Scuffles broke out in central Tehran last night between Mr Mousavi’s supporters and police. Several websites, including the BBC, appeared to have been blocked.

Earlier yesterday the Interior Ministry banned all rallies until the result is announced, and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appealed for calm. "Passion and motivation is high among people," he said. "If some intend to create tension, this will harm the people."

Voting was extended well into the evening after tens of millions of people queued for hours in the baking sun outside the schools and mosques that served as polling stations.
President Obama expressed hope for a fresh start for the West’s relations with Iran. "We think there’s the possibility of change," Mr Obama said. "You’re seeing people looking at new possibilities. And whoever ends up winning the election in Iran, the fact that there’s been a robust debate hopefully will help advance our ability to engage them in new ways."

Centrist voters in northern Tehran turned out in almost unprecedented numbers to support Mr Mousavi. In the wealthy district of Shahrak Gharb, about a hundred voters in stylish clothes and sunglasses had arrived outside the polling station before it opened. "I’ve never seen so many people here so early. There are usually no more than ten or fifteen," Mehran Lotfi, the presiding officer, said.

A few miles away, at the Hosseineh Ershad mosque, voters queued for more than two hours to cast their ballots, and appeared overwhelmingly to support Mr Mousavi. "I didn’t want to vote because I don’t believe in the regime, but I want to get rid of Ahmadinejad," said Sahand Tehrani, 19, a film stuntman.

In a kebab house near the centre of the city all but one of the half-dozen customers backed Mr Mousavi. "We don’t want to look like terrorists. We want to be respected in the international community," said Armin Abishi, 26, a transport company manager, the blue dye on his index finger showing that he had voted.

There were allegations of dirty tricks. Mr Mousavi said that some of his monitors had been denied access to polling stations, that the text messaging system that his campaign has used to mobilise the youth vote was shut down, and that in some of his strongholds the polling stations ran out of ballot papers.
"I expect cheating," said Masoud Asadi, a veteran Iranian journalist, who claimed that the Government had printed many more ballot papers than there were voters.

"One thousand per cent, I believe Mousavi will be elected. About 20 of us have promised among ourselves to go on the streets if he’s not," Mohammed Ghadami, 21, a student, said.

However, in poorer areas, where women were mostly clad in long black chadors and very few spoke English, Mr Ahmadinejad enjoyed strong support. On one street corner, Shapour Rasolzadeh, 39, a motorbike courier, offered to cut his wrist and soak an Iranian flag with his blood to prove his love of the President. "He’s made Iran great again. All the world has witnessed what he’s done for Iran," he said.

In a mosque in the Shoosh district of south Tehran, a group of men said that they were solidly behind Mr Ahmadinejad. "I’m voting for someone who comes from the people," Bahram Salehi, a taxi driver, said.

Just south of Tehran, at the tomb of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the republic, The Times found scarcely a single Mousavi supporter among the hundreds of pilgrims. "Whoever wants to become president should support poor people and improve their life, and Ahmadinejad has done that 100 per cent," Ebrahim Jhadem, 21, said.

Some voters who had supported Mr Ahmadinejad in 2005 had switched to his opponent. Their most common complaint was rampant inflation.

"I’ve switched to Mousavi because I think he’ll improve the economy. Under Ahmadinajad the inflation rate has shot up," said Abolfazl Zamani, a bazaari, in the mosque in Shoosh.

"He claimed he wanted to help poor people, but he’s done just the opposite," said Marjan Davari, a young mother.

There was little support for Mehdi Karoubi, the former parliamentary Speaker, who was also a candidate.
 
Source: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6489120.ece

Posted by: Jéssica

The English Language


If pro and cons are opposites, is congress the opposite of progress?

English is the most widely used language in the history of our planet.

One in every seven human beings can speak it. More than half of the world’s books and three quarters of international mail are in English. Of all languages, English has the largest vocabulary – perhaps as many as two million words – and one of the noblest bodies of literature.

Nonetheless, let’s face it: English is a crazy language. There is no egg in eggplant, neither pine nor apple in pineapple and no ham in a hamburguer.

English muffins weren’t invented in England or French fries in France. Sweetmeats are candy, while sweetbreads, which aren’t sweet, are meat.

We take English for granted. But when we explore its paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square, public bathrooms have no baths and a guinea pig is neither a pig nor from Guinea.

And why is it that a writer writes, but fingers don’t fing, grocers don’t groce, humdingers don’t hum and hammers don’t ham? If the plural of tooth is teeth, shouldn’t the plural of booth be beeth? One goose, two geese – so one moose, two meese? One index, two indices – one Kleenex, two Kleenices?

Sometimes I wonder if all English speakers should be commited to an asylum for the verbally insane. In what other language do people drive on a parkway and oark in a drive way?

Recite at a play and play at a recital? Ship by truck and send cargo by ship? Have noses that run and feet that smell?

You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language in which your house can burn up as it burns down, in which you fill in a form by filling it out and in which your alarm clock goes off by going on.
English was invented by people, not computers, and it reflects the creativity of the human race( which, of course, isn’t really a race at all).

That is why, when stars are out they are visible, but when the lights are out they are invisible. And why, when I wind up my watch I start it, but when I wind up This essay I end it.


LEDERER, Richard. TN9CCAA. Editora CCAA, Rio de Janeiro, 1989.


Posted by: Ana Carolina

World Cup History



How It All Began

The seeds which marked the beginning of this great event were planted by the president of the World Football Federation, in 1926. There would be no such thing as a world cup history if it were not for Jules Rimet, who first took the presidency in 1921. The positive message infused by Rimet is summarized by his famous words "Soccer could reinforce the ideals of a permanent and real peace", as he pushed to organize an international event that would make no discrimination on the grounds of professional or amateur status. As his words were spoken the plans for a world tournament involving all of the federations was being planned for the coming 3 to 4 years. Along with the help of 5 other officials, Rimet organized the event for 1930. Via congressional meetings of the World Football Federation the semantics for the tournament were laid out and finalized. On May 26th, 1928 the World Cup was born. History was changed forever as five European countries plus a chosen host of Uruguay planned to hold the first tournament on May 18th, 1929 at the congress of Barcelona. Uruguay was chosen as host based on their outstanding Olympic record, and as Rimet was encouraging a regime of international peace, utilizing the reputation the Olympic games already held was simply intelligent leveraging.The actualization of the event did not transpire until the year later, when on July 13th, 1930 the first game of the first world cup kicked off in Pocitos Stadium, and France beat Mexico 4 to 1. This truly marked the beginning of a long and wonderful world cup history.

Winners of the first World Cup

Uruguay - 1930




Since then 18 world cups occurred:



World Cup 1930 / Italy 1934 / France 1938 / Brazil 1950 / Switzerland 1954 / Sweden 1958
Chile 1962 / England 1966 / Mexico 1970 / Germany 1974 / Argentina 1978 / Spain 1982
Mexico 1986 / Italy 1990 / United States 1994 / France 1998 / World Cup 2002 / World Cup 2006






Videos: http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/video/worldcups.html


Source: http://www.world-cup-info.com/history.htm


By: Marta Lamounier

The Story of Halloween



Halloween, a day of fright, folklore, goblins and above all fun for all those who are of a mind to simply enjoy themselves by letting loose their imagination however many may ask what is the history behind this holiday that has come to be celebrated through out the world? First off all we might ask what are the origins of the name Halloween and what if any meaning does it have?

Halloween is one of the oldest holidays with origins going back thousands of years. The holiday we know as Halloween has had many influences from many cultures over the centuries. From the Roman's Pomona Day, to the Celtic festival of Samhain, to the Christian holidays of All Saints and All Souls Days.

Hundreds of years ago in what is now Great Britain and Northern France, lived the Celtics. The Celtics worshipped nature and had many gods, with the sun god as their favorite. It was "he" who commanded their work and their rest times, and who made the earth beautiful and the crops grow.The Celtics celebrated their New Year on November 1st. It was celebrated every year with a festival and marked the end of the "season of the sun" and the beginning of "the season of darkness and cold."The Celtics believed, that during the winter, the sun god was taken prisoner by Samhain, the Lord of the Dead and Prince of Darkness. On the eve before their new year (October 31), it was believed that Samhain called together all the dead people. The dead would take different forms, with the bad spirits taking the form of animals. The most evil taking the form of cats. On October 31st after the crops were all harvested and stored for the long winter the cooking fires in the homes would be extinguished. The Druids, the Celtic priests, would meet in the hilltop in the dark oak forest (oak trees were considered sacred). The Druids would light new fires and offer sacrifices of crops and animals. As they danced around the fires, the season of the sun passed and the season of darkness would begin.When the morning arrived the Druids would give an ember from their fires to each family who would then take them home to start new cooking fires. These fires would keep the homes warm and free from evil spirits.The November 1st festival was named after Samhain and honored both the sun god and Samhain. The festival would last for 3 days. Many people would parade in costumes made from the skins and heads of their animals. This festival would become the first Halloween.The Halloween we celebrate today includes all of these influences, Pomona Day's apples, nuts, and harvest, the Festival of Samhain's black cats, magic, evil spirits and death, and the ghosts, skeletons and skulls from All Saint's Day and All Soul's Day.

Source: http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/8149/hal-story.html

By: Marta Lamounier